Publication Types:

Sort by year:

Do Naming Practices Influence Boundary Crossing for Immigrants in the U.S.? Experimental Evidence on Perceptions of Multi-Generational Nativity, Citizenship Status, and Race/Ethnicity

Under ReviewWorking Paper
S. Michael Gaddis, A. Nicole Kreisberg, Charles Crabtree
Working paper. Available at SSRN.
Publication year: 2024

Abstract

Immigrants have several tools at their disposal to assimilate into and cross over nativity and racial/ethnic boundaries in receiving countries. First names, for example, can mark immigrants’ children as more ‘American’ and less ‘immigrant’ and perhaps limit discrimination based on nativity status. However, limited research examines how Americans perceive such names, restricting scholarly understanding of who is allowed to cross nativity and racial/ethnic boundaries. We conduct four survey experiments with 6,651 respondents, examining 80,920 perceptions of multi-generational nativity, citizenship status, and race/ethnicity from 712 racialized names. We find that respondents rate fully-ethnic Chinese, Hispanic, and Indian names as more likely to belong to recent immigrants and less likely to belong to citizens than White and Black names. Respondents rate anglicized first names with ethnic last names between those groups. Moreover, they view anglicized first names with Hispanic last names as less likely to belong to recent immigrants and more likely to belong to citizens and Whites than other ethnic counterparts. Our findings suggest that (1) individuals with anglicized Hispanic names are most able to cross boundaries and (2) overall boundaries based on nativity may be more porous than those based on race and ethnicity.

Keywords

  • Immigration
  • Citizenship
  • Names
  • Nativity
  • Boundary Formation

Racial/Ethnic Discrimination and Heterogeneity Across Schools in the U.S. Public Education System: A Correspondence Audit of Principals

R&RUnder ReviewWorking Paper
S. Michael Gaddis, Charles Crabtree, John B. Holbein, and Steven Pfaff
Working paper.
Publication year: 2024

Abstract

Although numerous studies document different forms of discrimination in the U.S. public education system, very few provide plausibly causal estimates. Thus, it is unclear to what extent public school principals discriminate against racial and ethnic minorities. Moreover, no studies test for heterogeneity in racial/ethnic discrimination by individual-level resource needs and school-level resource strain – potentially important moderators in the education context. Using a correspondence audit, we examine bias against Black, Hispanic, and Chinese American families in interactions with 52,792 public K-12 principals in 33 states. Our research provides causal evidence that Hispanic and Chinese American families face significant discrimination in initial interactions with principals, regardless of individual-level resource needs. Black families, however, only face discrimination when they have high resource needs. Additionally, principals in schools with greater resource strain discriminate more against Chinese American families. This research uncovers complexities of racial/ethnic discrimination in the K-12 context because we examine multiple racial/ethnic groups and test for heterogeneity across individual- and school-level variables. These findings highlight the need for researchers conducting future correspondence audits to expand the scope of their research to provide a more comprehensive analysis of racial/ethnic discrimination in the U.S.

Keywords

  • Correspondence audits
  • K-12 education
  • Racial/ethnic discrimination
  • Public schools

Signaling Class: An Examination of the Treatment Validity of Names Used to Signal Race in Bias Experiments with Methodological Recommendations for Name Selection

R&RUnder ReviewWorking Paper
S. Michael Gaddis
Working paper. Available at SSRN.
Publication year: 2023

Abstract

Racial bias experiments commonly use names to signal race as treatments. However, recent methodological examinations find that individuals often perceive class and race together. This calls into question the treatment validity of thousands of experiments. Still, little evidence exists on what leads to name perceptions and how scholars might increase treatment validity in future studies. I suggest that racialized and classed demographic naming patterns may influence individuals’ perceptions of names. I conducted two survey experiments and used demographic birth record data to examine social class perceptions. In total, 7,695 respondents provided 82,321 perceptions on 636 combinations of first and last names. Although demographic naming patterns have small effects on respondents’ social class perceptions of White-signaled names, classed patterns have a large effect on respondents’ perceptions of Black-signaled names. These findings suggest that treatment validity is a severe problem for bias experiments. To help mitigate this problem, I provide seven recommendations that researchers should implement in all experiments that use names to signal various characteristics. Scholars who follow these recommendations will neutralize or minimize threats to treatment validity, engage in a more empirical and open scientific process, and, in some cases, open up new avenues of research on bias.

Keywords

  • Social class
  • Racial/ethnic discrimination
  • Names
  • Audit Studies
  • Experiments